***Dave Does the Blog

US Government Building Big New Memory Hole for the State Department

“It’ll be the most beautiful, greatest, deepest memory hole, maybe ever.”

Want to know what sort of travel advisories a country had in the past?

What about records of meetings between State Department officials and foreign governments and organizations?

Or descriptions of diplomatic efforts and international aid programs the US led or was part of in years gone by?

Sorry. You’re Shit Outta Luck.

U.S. State Department Keeps Quiet Over Plans To Block Travelers From Social Media Content Posted Before President Trump’s Second Term

American travelers might have a hard time accessing the previously available information posted by the State Department under a new directive.

www.thetravel.com/us-state-department-keeps-quiet-plans-block-travelers-from-social-media-posts-trump-second-term/

The State Dept. has been directed to archive and delete all its social media content from prior to the Trump Regime taking power in January 2025. It will still be technically available to the public — but only with a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request.

I mean, we can’t have people knowing that the US once donated COVID vaccines to other countries now that the Trump Regime has dictated that’s a waste of money (and evil mainstream science to boot!). We can’t see records of the US offering condolences to other nations for losses in natural disasters or deaths of prominent individuals, not with the Regime redefining who’s a Good Guy and who’s a Bad Guy and that We Have Always Been At War With Eastasia. And certainly notes about cultural programming and exchanges between the US and other nations should be hidden from view, now that the Trump Regime has made it clear that only Pro-American Cultural Stuff (with lots of gilt!) is worth our paying attention to.

And certainly anything that smacks of “history of the past” must be torn down, hidden, and, maybe, someday, re-evaluated according to the Regime’s current standards, so as to avoid “a false reconstruction of American history.”

And surely we don’t need to worry about any of this, because the Regime assures us it is the most transparent and trustworthy government ever, and, if they have their way, no evidence will be available to disprove it.

You must save us from the thing we did, because it was stupid, so you need to let it happen!

The guy in charge of national security is using “national security” he’s endangered to get his own way.

Meanwhile, in Cloud-Cuckoo Land, we have this particular spectacle.

DOJ raises 'national security' concerns in legal fight over Trump ballroom

A federal judge is considering an injunction to halt contstruction.

abcnews.go.com/Politics/doj-raises-national-security-concerns-legal-fight-trump/story

So, it looks like these are the steps.

“We plan to build a ball room. We are the Unitary Executive and so can do whatever we want.”
“We didn’t have to wait for anyone to give us permission to build a ball room, so we started the project anyway, but we promise we’ll go through all the proper reviews and approvals before actually building anything.”
“Oh, also, we’re going to fire all the people who might have said no to us, and replace them with people who will say yes to us.”
“We have to get this done quickly and build the building that the architect left the project about because that was the plan all along.”
“What? You want us to wait so proper approvals can be gotten and possible violations of rules can be litigated? How can we possibly do that? We’ve torn a huge hole into the White House, and also demolished all the critical underground infrastructure, assuming we’d be able to rebuild it instantly. So you can’t stop the project now because it will be a Horrible National Security Problem!”

So .. are we talking about incompetence? Or a semi-competent scam, planned this way all along?

The one thing you can’t call it is a good-faith execution of a nationally significant capital project.

Which, actually, was damned stupid, because, in principle, everyone agrees that the White House could use better, larger-scale entertainment facilities. The one element of truth here from Trump is that every president for the past few decades has wanted to do something better than renting big tents to put on the lawn. This could have been handled as a collaborative project, following the procedures, and serving as an example of good will and unified action to the betterment of the nation.

But that might require compromise. It might require a tacit acknowledgement that Trump cannot do whatever he wants. It more show that the President needs to adhere to (gasp) procedures, to (eek!) work and play with others, and rely on collaboration to achieve nifty things.

None of which Trump would ever dream of doing. Because he’s The Omnipotent Tinpot Dictator type, and following the rules and collaborating and compromising is something only wusses do.

The bottom line is, now we are told that a project that was rushed past all the guard rails, with assurances that there was all the time in the world, now must be rushed to conclusion because Trump’s own actions have made the current situation (according to them) such that the nation is unsafe.

Run that by again. According to the Trump administration itself, we are currently unsafe because they too-quickly dismantled critical infrastructure that the country needed, because they wanted to do it faster than they knew they would be allowed to do otherwise.

Hell of a President, Donald.

Another day, another array of infuriating, stupid, and/or evil shenanigans

It’s the shotgun approach to disheartening, disengaging, and deadening the electorate.

There is a technique exercised by folk trying to deflect criticism, or confuse potential critics, or shift attention from particular wrongdoings, or even just turn off people so much they stop paying attention because it’s so bewildering, or so maddening, or so apparently-unstoppable.

It’s a technique that, knowingly or not, the Trump Regime is practicing in spades.

Day to day, it’s nigh-impossible to focus on the latest shenanigans from Trump and/or his coterie of lickspittles and proto-fascists. It’s shock-and-awe, news cycle style, where bright lights and loud noises are going off in too many directions, and changing from day to day, so that what seemed awful yesterday is forgotten tomorrow.

Just a few instances, from the relatively small to the profoundly dangerous.

National Park Service Incites Anger By Quietly Removing Banned Signs From Civil War Site

The NPS Has Removed Climate Change Signs From A Civil War Landmark

www.thetravel.com/national-park-service-removes-banned-signs-from-civil-war-site/

Trump’s ostrich-head-in-the-sand approach to climate change has the NPS removing signs from the Ft Sumter site warning that rising sea levels could destroy the location. Can’t have people thinking all those re-opened coal plants might do any harm, can we?

New York school violated civil rights law by changing name from ‘Thunderbirds’ to ‘T-Birds,’ US says

BOHEMIA, N.Y. (AP) — A New York school district is “erasing its Native American heritage” and violating civil rightBOHEMIA, N.Y. (AP) — A New York school district is “erasing its Native American heritage” and violating civil rights law by changing its team name from the “Thunderbirds” to the “T-Birds,” federal education officials say.s law by changing its team name from the “Thunderbirds” to the “T-Birds,” federal education officials say.

apnews.com/article/native-american-school-mascots-names-new-york-8f9135ac28e1c82838d9bc6cf1993b39

The long effort to get schools to stop frivolously using Native American symbols or stereotypes is now being actively opposed by the Trump Regime as somehow violating Native American rights. Bring back the “Redskins,” I guess.

UK PM, others outraged at Trump's comments downplaying NATO allies' role during Afghanistan war

Prince Harry and the British Prime Minister slammed Trump over his comments.

abcnews.go.com/Politics/uk-pm-outraged-trumps-comments-downplaying-nato-allies/story

Donald seems to get particular joy in insulting people who don’t kowtow to him properly. What better way than offending our allies and their war dead, after they joined with the US post-911 in the only Article 5 action NATO has ever taken.

He backed off today, at least regarding UK troops. It’s unclear if he simply wants to further fragment NATO unity, or because he wants to keep the UK cooperating on trade deals.

DOJ sought to probe Renee Good for criminal liability, even after her death

A judge refused an FBI warrant that proposed investigating dead Minnesota mom for suspected assault on an officer.

www.ms.now/news/doj-sought-to-probe-renee-good-for-criminal-liability-even-after-her-death-sources

First the Trump Regime yoinked investigation around Good’s killing to the FBI. Then they dropped it, trying instead to investigate Good (who is dead) as being criminally liable. That led to still more DoJ / FBI folk resigning in protest.

But, hey, who cares, since the DoJ leadership has declared, by fiat, that Good was absolutely guilty (ignore any other interpretations of the videos taken of her shooting), and so why bother with investigating the death? That would be a waste of good whitewash, by God!

Meanwhile, the latest DHS shooting (of Alex Pretti) won’t even go to the FBI — the DHS (which did the shooting) will investigate the matter itself. Gee, wonder how that will turn out?

And that’s all just a fraction of what the Regime has done in the last day or two. Who knows what they’ll do tomorrow to distract from those misdeeds, malpractice, and crimes?

And so it goes.

Oh, by the way, Donald, where are those remaining Epstein Files?

The Toddler-in-Chief

Watching a toddler throw a tantrum is sometimes amusing, often aggravating. When the toddler controls a massive military, it becomes terrifying

Another day, another example of Donald Trump shrieking his displeasure for not being given things he thinks should be his.

“I deserve the Nobel Peace Prize!” he cries out. “You Norwegians are all poopy-heads!”

“I deserve Greenland!” he screams. “You Danes are all poopy-heads!”

Never mind in all this that (a) the nation of Norway doesn’t give out the Nobel Prizes, or that (b) Norway and Denmark are long-term allies of the US, or that (c) the population of Greenland does not want to be owned by Donald Trump.

Nope. Donald wants it. Therefore Donald should have it. Therefore anyone stopping him from having what he wants should be shouted at, bullied, threatened, and punished.

(Note that giving Donald what he wants is no guarantee that won’t happen either. His quid pro quo log has a very short expiry date.)

Today’s installment:

Trump links Greenland threat to Nobel Peace Prize snub, EU prepares to retaliate

U.S. President Donald Trump has linked his drive to take control of Greenland to his failure to win the Nobel Peace Prize, saying he no longer thought "purely of Peace" as the row over the island threatened to reignite a trade war with Europe.

www.reuters.com/world/europe/trump-tells-norway-he-no-longer-feels-obligation-think-only-peace-2026-01-19/

Yes, see, for Donald, “peace” is only valuable if it gets him what he thinks he deserves. Like, say, a Nobel Peace Prize. If Norway doesn’t give him one, then obviously there’s no point in being “peaceful.”

(Again, the Norwegian government doesn’t give out the Nobel Peace Prize. But Donald, being Donald, assumes that if they really wanted to play ball with him, the Norwegian government would lean on the Nobel Committee to do so, or threaten their funding, or pass a law requiring they give him one, etc. Because that’s what government is for.)

Not that Donald has been “peaceful” during his reign. Venezuela certainly doesn’t think so. Iran certainly doesn’t think so. Any of the number of places we’ve bombed or droned don’t think so.

But Donald thinks so because, in his mind (as whispered to him by folk like Stephen Miller), if there was a possibility of a war and he said that he didn’t want it to happen, then if it didn’t happen it didn’t happen because of him. Thus his ever-changing, usually-but-not-always-growing tallies of wars he’s “stopped.” It’s magical thinking in its most twisted fashion.

The result, according to his text to Norway’s PM:

Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.

Aside from the ridiculous claim that he “thinks purely of Peace,” the idea that not getting a Nobel Peace Prize means he should stop doing so demonstrates how trivial his commitment to “Peace” was.

Oh, and by the way, until Europe forces Denmark to hand over Greenland to him, he’ll keep imposing more and bigger tariffs. Because that’s how you’d expect a toddler to react. “Gimme what I want, or you’ll be sorry!”

Greenland has become emblematic of the Trump Regime’s sickness

When bullying is presented as, not just okay, but a moral imperative.

Something that started as a “ha ha, doesn’t he say the darnedest things?” moment years ago — the idea of the US taking over Greenland — is becoming more and more a sign of how out-of-control and downright un-American Donald Trump and his coterie of yes-men and evil genius-wannabes have become.

Let’s start here:

Trump says he may punish countries with tariffs if they don’t back US controlling Greenland

resident Donald Trump suggested Friday that he may punish countries with tariffs if they don’t back the U.S. controlling Greenland, a message that came as a bipartisan Congressional delegation sought to lower tensions in the Danish capital.

www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2026-01-17/trump-threatens-tariffs-us-control-greenland-20432348.html

Trump is a bully. If he has power over you, he will wield it. If he thinks bribes will work, he’ll offer them. If he thinks threats will work, he’ll instantly pivot and issue them. There is no principle involved, except for force.

Here we see the next step. First he muses out loud about what shiny thing he’d like to have. Then he says he hopes someone will give it to him. Then he starts issuing threats.

Trump loves tariffs (so far — there’s a vague chance that SCOTUS might actually grow a pair and say that his arbitrary imposition of them is illegal, but we’ll see). The (appear, to him) to give him money, and it lets him punish people by taking their money, so it’s a win-win for him.

There’s a significant escalation, of course, between tariffs as a means of balancing asserted economic imbalances, and tariffs as a coercion to back his latest whims.

Trump doesn’t care. Either he’ll get what he wants (support for absconding with Greenland), or he’ll get (as he sees it) a bunch more money, punish those who didn’t say nice things about his policy, and still move forward to abscond with Greenland.

If he can do it, he will. If he can’t — well, who’s ever to say he can’t?

Which brings us next to this little gem.

Miller amid Greenland push: Nations not entitled to territories ‘they cannot defend’

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller on Friday doubled down on the Trump administration’s argument that acquiring Greenland is “essential” for U.S. national security.

thehill.com/policy/international/5694105-stephen-miller-greenland-acquisition-defense/

Stephen Miller is sort of the eminence grise of the Trump Regime — or maybe its toxic dump, always lurking in the background and leaching poisons into the surrounding land and water. Trump listens to what he has to say to an appalling degree.

In this case, he clearly expounds on his guiding principle which lines up perfectly with his boss: If we can take it, we will take it, and, in fact, we should take it. Or, framed another way, Might Makes Right.

Now, I am not so naive as to think that this attitude is not unique to Miller, or to this moment in American history. The US has always had voices whispering, “Take it! Do it! You’re powerful! You’re proud! It should be yours! Take it!”

But, at the very least, Miller, and Trump, and the rest of the gang of imperialists, have shifted to saying the quiet part out loud. If we want it, we can take it. If we can take it, we should take it.

He added that because Denmark “cannot defend” Greenland, citing weaknesses in their military and economy, that it should not have claims to the land. “To control a territory, you have to be able to defend a territory, improve a territory, inhabit a territory,” Miller said. “Denmark has failed at every single one of these tests.”

If a land is not covered with mines and factories and highways, clearly it’s being neglected, and therefore should be taken.

If a land is not bristling with fortresses and air bases, clearly it’s not being defended, and therefore should be taken.

(Never mind that Greenland has existed in its current state for many, many decades, and during much warmer conflict between the US and the Soviet Union, and yet was never invaded by the Russians, nor annexed by the US. We had more military bases there — but, remarkably, that’s not currently seen as an option now.)

The president’s political adviser claimed the U.S. was already on the hook to spend “hundreds of billions of dollars” to defend Denmark as a NATO ally. “It’s a raw deal, it’s an unfair deal, and most importantly, it’s unfair to the American taxpayer, who has subsidized all of Europe’s defense for generations now,” he told “Hannity.”

If we do something for them, they are morally obligated to give us stuff. Which is a remarkable moral stance as well.

But this is how the US government — at least the Unitary Executive — works. Kindness, compassion, even fairness — those are for wusses. Only force — threatened, then used — garners respect and obedience and profit. Why should respect and obedience and profit be given? Because we say so.

Bullying is not an uncommon human trait, sadly enough. The difference here is that the bullies themselves are asserting it as a moral imperative. They have (as they have demonstrated clearly over the last decade-plus) no shame. They will baldly point the gun, say hand me your wallet, take it, and laugh.

It certainly plays well with the The US is the greatest country on Earth, so we should be in charge crowd of jingoists that we always seem to be afflicted with — and who never question what “greatest” means beyond just “powerful”? The questions before us are, will everyone else actually recognize the dangers of the Regime’s actions and motivations … and will we actually get a chance to correct it?

Pete Hegseth thinks Stars and Stripes is too “Woke”

In Trumpland, “Independence” is something to engrave on a wall, not actually allow for anyone.

Stars and Stripes is a semi-independent newspaper published for US military personnel by an independent (by statute) editorial board.

So, of course, Hegseth needs remove any of those “independent” parts of it. He’s mandated it get rid of “woke distractions” to military personnel, and instread focus on “warfighting, weapons systems, fitness, lethality, survivability, and ALL THINGS MILITARY.”

Pentagon taking over Stars and Stripes to eliminate ‘woke distractions’

The Pentagon announced Thursday it would take editorial control of independent military newspaper Stars and Stripes to refocus coverage on “warfighting” and remove “woke distractions.”

thehill.com/policy/defense/5692054-pentagon-control-stars-stripes-newspaper/

What sort of “woke” things has Stars and Stripes been doing? Apparently, for Hegseth, “woke” means “repurposed DC gossip columns [and] Associated Press reprints.”

‘Stars and Stripes’ Responds to Pentagon Targeting ‘Woke’ Independent News

The Pentagon’s directive to refocus “Stars and Stripes” on warfighter messaging has triggered alarms across newsrooms and press freedom groups, raising questions about whether the military’s historic newspaper can remain editorially independent.

www.military.com/daily-news/headlines/2026/01/16/pentagons-stripes-shakeup-sparks-press-freedom-alarm.html

S&S has long served as a news channel for the US military, especially those serving overseas. Its mission is laid out simply:

Stars and Stripes provides independent news and information to the U.S. military community, including active-duty servicemembers, DoD civilians, veterans, contractors, and their families. Unique among Department of Defense authorized news outlets, Stars and Stripes is governed by the principles of the First Amendment.

S&S also notes:

Stars and Stripes is a service of the Defense Media Activity (DMA); the views and opinions expressed do not reflect the views of the Department of Defense, the military services or DMA. The Pentagon funding that makes up roughly half of Stars and Stripes’ annual budget is primarily used to print and distribute the newspaper to troops scattered across the globe, including in warzones. The remainder of the newspaper’s funding comes from advertising and subscriptions. Stars and Stripes is editorially independent of interference from outside its own editorial chain-of-command. It provides commercially available U.S. and world news and objective staff-produced stories relevant to the military community in a balanced, fair, and accurate manner. By keeping its audience informed, Stars and Stripes enhances military readiness and better enables U.S. military personnel and their families stationed overseas to exercise their responsibilities of citizenship.

Well, that sounds sketchy! We cannot have military personnel deciding for themselves how to “exercise their responsibilities of citizenship,” can we?

So what sort of terrible “woke” things have they been reporting on to give Hegseth a hissy-fit? Well, here are the headlines I just copied down from its front page:

Military now requires doctors to offer chaperone for sensitive medical exams
Polar Star icebreaker marks 50 years in Coast Guard service
Bill designates site for “Rosie the Riveter” memorial in the nation’s capital
Treasury and IRS say :”warrior dividend” not taxable
New Air Force helicopter flies its first ICBM security mission
VA awards disability benefits using criteria from 80 years ago, federal watchdog finds
Congress calls for expanded multilateral defense ties across Indo-Pacific
DOD commissaries expand home delivery program in 70 locations stateside
Coast Guard acting commandant Lunday officially installed in service’s top job
Navy veterans unveil monument to Filipino-American sailors on former US base
Kurdish-led forces to withdraw from contested area in Syria after US military visit
Marine Corps general tapped to lead SOUTHCOM grilled over presence in region
Navy airlifts mariner showing signs of heart attack to hospital on Guam

Those all sound like actual news, things that have happened, that might well be of interest to folk serving in the armed forces. And stories that wouldn’t necessarily show up in civilian news feeds.

But I guess there’s not enough spurting blood and roaring rockets and paeans of praise for the ~~Defense~~ WAR!! Department leadership, or something showing up there. Not in Hegseth’s eyes. If his myrmidons are not being properly propagandized with Pentagon-mandated WARFIGHTER! news items, 24×7, there’s every chance they might have (or even express) an opinion that varies from his.

Pentagon says it will ‘refocus’ Stars and Stripes content

The Pentagon suggested it would take over editorial decision making for Stars and Stripes, which has long retained independence under a congressional mandate.

www.stripes.com/theaters/us/2026-01-15/pentagon-refocus-stars-and-stripes-content-20415816.html

Stars and Stripes, which is dedicated to serving U.S. government personnel overseas, seeks to emulate the best practices of commercial news organizations in the United States. It is governed by Department of Defense Directive 5122.11. The directive states, among other key provisions, that “there shall be a free flow of news and information to its readership without news management or censorship.”

As noted, Congress mandated in the 1990s that S&S’s editorial board should be independent of the Pentagon, even while much of its personnel and budget come from there. But, as we have seen, “Independent” is as big a taboo word for the Trump Regime as “Inclusion” — anything that shows, even by law, any measure of independence from the Unitary Executive must be crushed and brought into line, filled with right-thinking ideologues and toadies, and made one more weapon in the arsenal of the Regime.

And, so far at least, legal challenges to Presidential Power have largely shown that the Sun King has a majority of supporters on the Supreme Court he has himself largely created ready to back whatever it is he wants to do — laws or principle be damned.

YOU get a Nobel Prize, and YOU get a Nobel Prize, and YOU …!

Should we all point and laugh, or stay quiet at the Emperor’s New Nobel Prize?

Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado has told reporters that she “presented” her 2025 Nobel Peace Prize to Donald Trump when they met today.

María Corina Machado ‘Presented’ Donald Trump With Her Nobel Peace Prize

María Corina Machado told Fox News that she presented the Nobel Peace Prize she won to President Donald Trump when she met with him at the White House.

www.mediaite.com/media/news/maria-corina-machado-presented-donald-trump-with-her-nobel-peace-prize/

I’m torn. Assuming Trump “accepted’ the prize (something I would wager a small amount of money that he did), should we …

Point and laugh at Trump getting a second-hand Nobel Peace Prize (and at the concept that he even deserves one), esp. since they are non-transferable and because it’s such a bald-faced attempt to curry favor?

Or stay quiet and let Trump bask in his own ego space so that maybe he will STFU about how much he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize because he has stopped two hundred wars since he came to office, and blew up some people really bigly in the cause of peace?

Greenland, Trump, and Backing Oneself into a Corner

The whole quixotic effort to annex Greenland is gonzo — but that doesn’t mean it won’t happen.

But two more thoughts about it.

First, and not at all surprisingly, Trump’s tactics here are not only alarming Americans, including what semi-responsible wing of the party is still in Congress, they are actively alienating the people of Greenland itself.

Trump wants Greenlanders to join the US. His comments are making that harder.

Even residents open to independence from Denmark have been put off by the president’s bullying tactics.

www.politico.com/news/2026/01/14/trump-greenland-residents-independence-00726696

The problem is that, for all that Trump paints himself as “King of the Deal,” his impatience, ego, and ~~cognitive decline~~ whimsy make him both a terrible negotiator and insistent on being in the heart of the negotiations. Especially since a big motivation for this efforts is Trump’s own need to seem important and powerful, he can’t help but chime in every time the subject comes up, and do so in the most arrogant and offsetting way he can.

The only way Trump negotiates these days is through bullying. “You can have it the easy way or the hard way” style of threats. “It’s going to happen [whether you like it or not]” type of rhetoric. Which is effective (in the short term) if you can actually cow the people involved. But insult and threaten some people enough, and they become more implacable opponents.

Which doesn’t help the only other tactic he and his team have lit on: that the Greenlanders can be bought. There are proposals being floating that some sort of payment — one-time, or maybe annual — will be made to every Greenlander, as long as they agree to be owned by the US.

Not surprisingly, a lot of Greenlanders consider that insulting. Trump’s transactional nature always leads him to think that everyone has a price. The idea that people might resent that assumption is, to him, incomprehensible.

But that’s where Trump’s other major character flaw — magnified in his old age — comes up: his ego won’t let him back down unless he can do so without looking like the “loser.” He will go to any degree, twist any number of arms, make any level of promises, tantalize with any sort of profit, threaten any sort of dire result, to avoid looking like a “loser.” It’s the biggest, most abusive lesson his father taught him. Backing down, or even appearing to compromise, is for losers, and being a loser is the worst thing there is.

That’s where Trump runs into even deeper trouble regarding Greenland (and runs the US into trouble along with it). Having rattled sabers, explained Greenland’s immeasurable strategic importance, promised folk behind the scenes that they will have access to great natural resources, and been told about all the proposed 51-star US flags and statues that will be raised to him and how American school children will be taught about his achievement forever, and, heck, they’ll probably rename all those parts of Greenland which are named after old Danish kings for Trump instead … he can’t back down. He backed himself (and, so, the US) into a corner that has no exit but through: he needs to show his base, the nation, and the world that he won, and he can only do that by a deal or action that effectively takes over Greenland for the US.

So even though we have all sorts of treaty rights already to expand our military facilities there, and we can right now put a ring of US Navy ships in place that would cow any imaginary Chinese invasion … that’s no longer good enough. That would mean that something he has said will happen, must happen — the US owning Greenland — didn’t happen. And then people will laugh, and think he’s weak, and call him a loser, and he won’t be able to point to King Trump Land on the map or anything like that.

That’s the most imminent danger I see. That no matter how US public opinion (or Greenlandic public opinion, or Senatorial public opinion, or world public opinion) is against use of force here, the only opinion Donald really values — the frightened little boy in his head who is terrified of his father’s disapproval — is going to tell him he must do something Forceful and Strong and Powerful and Winning.

Like a Little Kid Playing “War”

Hegseth is, frankly, a chronically insecure bro who’s frantic to show how alpha he is.

One of the defining qualities of Trump Regime v.2 is its obsession with coming across as Super Tough Alpha Male Bros who Kick Ass and Take No Prisoners. Even the few women in Trump’s orbit (looking at you, Noem) frantically try to project that killer vibe, like they just stepped out of an old Sergio Leone spaghetti Western.

Nobody exemplifies this better than Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of ~~Defense~~ WAR!! As far as anyone can tell, all Hegseth is concerned about is killing people faster, better, and more macho-ly than anyone else. Never mind if they should be killed, or if there are ways to stop whoever they are without killing them, or even if killing (or being hair-trigger ready) to kill makes things more dangerous for us ... Pete is here to tell you that he can kill (or have killed) more bigly than anyone else, and anything that gets in the way of that and how he thinks it should be done is “woke” — and he isn’t having any of that.

Which makes his whole thing about AI in the Defense WAR!! Dept. all the more concerning.

Make ‘Star Trek’ real. Hegseth vows military AI without ‘woke’ constraints

Hegseth has been outspoken about ridding the military of so-called ‘woke’ policies, including diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/make-star-trek-real-hegseth-vows-military-ai-without-woke-constraints/ar-AA1U5Awi

“We will not employ AI models that won’t allow you to fight wars,” Hegseth added. He said the department would employ AI “without ideological constraints” that “will not be woke.”
Hegseth’s comments come amid growing concern about the threats posed by AI. U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres told the U.N. Security Council in September that AI needs “guardrails” and called for “a ban on lethal autonomous weapons systems operating without human control.”
Hegseth said the United States won’t be limited in its pursuit of new military capabilities. “We are done running a peacetime science fair while our potential adversaries are running a wartime arms race,” he said.

Or here:

Hegseth announces push to make US leader in AI, drones and space technology

Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth unveiled an artificial intelligence strategy for the military, aiming to make the U.S. a global leader in AI and drones.

www.foxbusiness.com/technology/hegseth-announces-push-make-us-leader-ai-drones-space-technology

“This strategy will unleash experimentation, eliminate bureaucratic barriers, focus on investments and demonstrate the execution approach needed to ensure we lead in military AI and that it grows more dominant into the future,” he said. “In short, we will win this race by becoming an AI-first warfighting force across all domains, from the back offices of the Pentagon to the tactical edge on the front lines.”

I don’t think he’s talking about AI running the HR systems at the Pentagon to make sure that all those non-male types don’t get promotions and that all those gay and trans folk are identified for dishonorable discharge. As far as I can tell from all the above and other things he’s said, I believe Hegseth’s goal is, in fact, “lethal autonomous weapons systems operating without human control” (except, presumably, from his desk).

Because that, of course, always goes so well.

Note that this has very little to do with directly protecting the US. This is about waving around a dick so big that everyone else will fall down and worship it. This is about instilling fear — not just in our potential or actual enemies, but amongst our friends and, for that matter, within our country.

This is, if not psychopathy, than a furious, frantic desire to be seen as the most powerful person(s) in existence, accountable to and restrained by nobody. It exemplifies Trump’s attitude toward everyone and everything, and it’s little surprise that he’s gathered a coterie that has the same fundamental insecurities and the same fundamental way of dealing with it.

By focusing on AI (a useful but clearly very immature technology, no matter what Elon Musk suggests) to create autonomous killing platforms (i.e., from Pete’s perspective, robots that can be told to go someplace and kill the things we want killed), I would argue that he is actually weakening America’s warfighting / defensive capabilities, in two ways:

It won’t work. Or won’t work reliably enough that he’ll dare actually deploy it. Or, more likely, won’t work reliably enough, but he’ll deploy it anyway and shrug off, deny, or downplay any “collateral damage” that comes from it.
This is assuming that it can be deployed within the timeframe of the current Regime — and I have no confidence that, even if not ready, it won’t be rushed into the field to prove how strong and macho Pete and Donald actually are. With all the tragic consequences that will follow. After all, how long have autonomous cars been being tested, and how many accidents are they still causing — or is Hegseth’s idea, egged on by Elon, that if you could just do away with all those safety settings, you could start mass production in a really short time?
In any case, it’s going to be a huge money sink (little wonder Trump the “we must cut government spending” dude, has proposed a mindboggling increase to the ~~defense~~ war!! budget). And to the degree that it doesn’t work and can’t be used, that’s money that’s been, at best, flushed down the crapper.
Note: I’m not worried about an actual Skynet super-intelligence-deciding-to-exterminate-humanity scenario — AI isn’t and won’t be that smart any time soon. I’m more worried of the opposite: stupid AI inadvertently exterminating humanity (or some chunk of it) because it thought they were a flock of geese, or because someone worded an order wrong, or because it took too many learning samples from DOOM.
If the US does it, every other nation that is worried about the US will have to do it (a number that continues to grow, by the Regime’s own design). Which takes all the concerns above and multiplies them.
Note that the answer to “Russia is definitely designing killbots” (something I have little doubt about) is not to say “Therefore we should be just as stupid.” The answer is “How do we neutralize that threat in a way that doesn’t echo all the existential threats of the nuclear stand-off that still exists today?”

Since broken (analog) clocks are right twice a day, credit to Hegseth for noting how the consolidation of the defense contracting industry has stifled innovation and driven up costs. Sure, the proposed solution sounds just like the “picking winners and losers” stuff that Trump campaigned against, but whatevs. Of course Hegseth instantly loses all that credit by leaning on Elon Musk (!) for advice on military matters.

Anyway, let’s just leave it with this reconfirms that Pete Hegseth is a menace and clearly too immature to be running the ~~WAR!!~~ Defense Department, regardless of who’s in the White House. That job requires someone who doesn’t need the job to make himself feel important and powerful and lethal and manly.

RIP, Scott Adams

It’s remarkable how big Dilbert’s creator was in my work environment. Until he wasn’t.

I was as big a Dilbert fanboy as anyone else working in white collar work (esp. tech) in the 90s and 00s. I had the wall calendars, the comic-a-day calendars, the collections … I had Dilberts posted outside my office door or my cube wall … I even incorporated Dilbert comics into (yes I feel the irony) PowerPoint presentations, always garnering laughter from the audience. It was all jolly, slightly-transgressive-toward-management fun.

Until it stopped being that.

Scott Adams, whose comic strip ‘Dilbert’ ridiculed white-collar office life, dies at 68

www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/scott-adams-whose-comic-strip-dilbert-ridiculed-white-collar-office-life-dies-at-68/ar-AA1U8lzm

Adams veering off to the zany Right (or becoming more public about it, one way or the other), made it all less fun, and invited reviewing some of those comics that had seemed just standard office humor when originally published.

But even where the humor was still funny, Adams became one of those folk for whom I chose not to spend my money any more. He was free to draw and write about whatever he wanted — but I didn’t have to buy it.

I do still have a lot of the older Dilberts saved in the Picture folder bowels of my computer, though.

While I found Adams’ political and social views increasingly repellent, I would never wish death from cancer on anyone, and I am sorry that he suffered what he did.

I’d love to look ahead a few decades (for more reasons than one) and see what Adams’ legacy is. Even now, it’s hard to think of any retrospective on office life in the 90s-00s that doesn’t have Dilbert as a touchstone for white collar concerns and frustrations of that period.

In any case, I’m sorry things went so wrong for him (by his own doing, to be sure), and that his life ended so poorly. I offer up my thanks, though, for all the chuckles he gave me during his career. RIP.

Trump’s weird obsession about wind power

Why is he so paranoid about it?

The abiding question behind almost everything Donald Trump does is figuring out why he’s doing it. Is it a grift? Is it an ego-boost? Is it political skulduggery? Is it vengeance? Or is it a weird misfiring set of synapses?

That pertains to his long-held bizarro-world views of wind power — something that produces power vitally needed by the ever-growing grid in the US.

Sure, it could be a matter of Trump rewarding fossil fuel billionaires for their donations, tied to his steadfast climate denialism. It could be a grift, concern over “unsightly” wind farms damaging the views from places like his golf courses.

Energy developers head to court as Trump says the US ‘will not approve any windmills’

Trump said his goal is to prevent any new wind farms, calling them “losers.”

www.denverpost.com/2026/01/12/trump-vs-offshore-wind/

But the way he approaches it strikes me as odd, and something beyond that. Every now and again, Trump will repeat his baseless claim that wind turbines cause cancer. Never mind the occupational danger and environmental health issues around fossil fuels — something has lodged in his brain that paints wind power as some sort of existential danger.

And, perhaps in an effort to turn “green” folk against them, he constantly brings up mass bird kills (even though wind turbines kill fewer birds, in various ways, than fossil fuels do).

Do wind turbines kill birds?

Yes—but only a fraction as many as are killed by house cats, buildings, or even the fossil fuel operations that wind farms replace.

climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/do-wind-turbines-kill-birds

He also is convinced that wind farms are “losers” economically — even though is Department of Energy still has a page on how they are anything but.

Advantages and Challenges of Wind Energy

Wind energy advantages explain why wind power is one of the fast-growing renewable energy sources in all the world.

www.energy.gov/eere/wind/advantages-and-challenges-wind-energy

At least for the moment, that page touts the positive benefits of jobs, renewable energy production, community benefits from taxes, and, ultimately, that “and-based, utility-scale wind turbines provide one of the lowest-priced energy sources available today.”

Not that Donald would ever let something like “facts” get in the way of something he’s decided is true. Admitting you were wrong is (from his point of view) for pussies.

Now, it’s easy to say, “Well, at worst, Trump is just delaying some of these projects by a few years.” But that assumes, first, that whoever comes behind him isn’t just as rabid on the topic as he is. Second, business demands stability in economics before they invest lots of money. The projects Donald is mid-stream canceling will cost many, many zeroes of lost money based on already-made investments. That sort of unstable business climate (“Can we afford to risk money in the US when in four years policy may swivel about 180 degrees”) means his actions will impact economic and clean energy production for a decade or more.

In short, he’s not only burning down these projects, he’s salting the earth so as to keep them from happening again, even after he’s gone.

Which, of course, can only hurt the US (and the world), but Donald doesn’t let that keep him up at night, as long as enough statues are erected to him in his lifetime.

Blaming the Victim for January 6

Winston Smith has a new corner office in the West Wing.

It’s classic abusive and abuse-enabling behavior. Blame the victim. “Look what you made me do to you!” “She shouldn’t have been dressed that way.” “Doing something stupid like that means you can’t complain about what happens to you.”

Now it’s top White House policy, as part of their Orwellian rewriting of history.

White House rewrites January 6 history and blames police for deadly attack on 5-year anniversary | CNN Politics

The White House rolled out a new website Tuesday with a full-blown recast of the historical record of January 6, 2021, hailing the pro-Trump mob who stormed the US Capitol five years ago as “peaceful protesters” who were provoked by law enforcement.

www.cnn.com/2026/01/06/politics/white-house-january-6-website

Trump Administration Posts False Jan. 6 Narrative on Riot’s 5th Anniversary

A new web page on the official White House site blames the Capitol Police and Democrats for the pro-Trump mob riot, absolving the president of responsibility and calling participants “innocent.”

www.nytimes.com/2026/01/06/us/politics/trump-white-house-jan-6-website.html

You see, the January 6 violent assault on the US Capitol was nothing of the kind. It was a peaceful protest by mere innocents and patriots who were righteously upset about how Joe Biden stole the 2020 election. Those guys beating up Capitol Police? They were the real victims here. Capitol police hospitalized, dead of heart attacks, suffering PTSD? They were the real criminals. Folks breaking into the building, smashing windows, threatening government officials? It’s all Nancy Pelosi’s fault.

Don’t believe your memory. Don’t believe the still-extant (for now) video recordings and photographs and eyewitness testimony from even Republicans who have since changed their stories. Believe only what the White House tells you.

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

National Security? Or Financial Security?

It sure sounds like Greenland is in the crosshairs because there’s a lot of money to be made there.

So we keep hearing from the Trump Regime about how the US must take over Greenland because it’s vital for National Security.

For example …

Trump’s Greenland threats put transatlantic alliance on death watch

“The Greenland issue does make everything even more complicated,” a senior European diplomat said.

www.axios.com/2026/01/07/greenland-trump-threat-nato-alliance

… we get statements like this:

“President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the U.S., and it’s vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region. The President and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal,” Leavitt said.
[…] Trump has repeated his position that the U.S. “needs” Greenland, and his claim that the Arctic island is surrounded by Russian and Chinese ships (the Danish official said that contradicts the intelligence assessments of both the U.S. and Denmark).

They make it sound like China (!) is about to launch a military invasion of Greenland. Not that this sounds at all likely (China’s navy, let alone air force, have no way of projecting power in the North Atlantic, and if Russian ships are swarming around Greenland, that’s a direct threat to the US in and of itself that I would think we would be taking action on).

That the US already has bases in Greenland makes another country invading there even less likely. Especially since pre-existing agreements let the US pretty much do what it wants in building more such bases. We can already make it into a fortress against hypothetical intrusion.

Buy Greenland? Take It? Why? An Old Pact Already Gives Trump a Free Hand.

Analysts say the Cold War agreement allows the president to increase the American military presence almost at will.

www.nytimes.com/2026/01/07/world/europe/trump-greenland-denmark-us-defense-pact.html

The problem is, as soon as any of the Trump officials finish saying anything about the Chinese/Russian menace, they keep talking, with a focus about how climate change and the reduction of polar ice (which, apparently, is okay to talk about when it comes to taking over Greenland, but not when it comes to fossil fuel policy) will make Northwest Passage-style shipping across the top of the Americas more likely.

Analysis: Why Trump wants to take Greenland | CNN Politics

America’s next conquest might become Trumpland.

www.cnn.com/2026/01/07/politics/trump-greenland-takeover-empire-venezuela-analysis

Trump says the US ‘needs’ Greenland. Here are five reasons why

The island’s strategic location above the Arctic Circle makes it a focal point in global security and trade debates

www.the-independent.com/news/world/europe/why-does-trump-want-greenland-denmark-b2895347.html

For Greenland’s Minerals, the Harsh Reality Behind the Glittering Promise

There is excitement about the potentially lucrative resources scattered around the island, especially the rare earths. But extreme weather, fired-up environmentalists and other factors have tempered hopes of a bonanza.

www.nytimes.com/2025/03/03/world/europe/greenland-minerals-trump.html

Which makes it sound like they really expect (or want us to think they expect) to be having to fight a naval war, within air base reach of the US, which is a bit bonkers.

More importantly, they go on about the vast mineral wealth of Greenland under the tundra — again, becoming more exposed by climate change (which we still don’t talk about, got it? except when we do …).

And at some point the discussion shifts from “We have to intervene to stop the Commies Russians & Chinese from taking over a valuable military location” to “Boy, is there a lot of money to be made in Greenland, we should go take it.”

Which makes it less about “national security” and more about “conquest” and “piracy” and “stealing.” The same tune playing loudly in the background as the Trump folk talk about, yeah, Maduro was an awful guy and a narco-criminal and Hey, isn’t it cool how much oil we can now take from Venezuela? Oil that belongs to the people there, except, no, it really belongs to us, because we’re running things.

Sure, sure, access to some of those minerals is of “strategic” economic importance. Wouldn’t want China to cut off our supplies of rare earths, etc. And that would be a lot more believable if we were talking about protecting Greenland for Greenlanders and simply putting in bases to make sure that the Chinese didn’t invade, and making investments in the country’s infrastructure under a profit-sharing arrangement that ostensibly benefits everyone, including the locals.

But when we say, “Cool! Mineral wealth for the US!” the whole thing sort of loses any moral high ground. Indeed, if the Chinese and Russians are, in fact, looking to take over the country and exploit it, it doesn’t sound that much different than what we’re going to do, except for the colors on the flag.

Of course, there are plenty of folk in the Trump Regime who think that’s just fine — that the only moral justification comes at the end of a metaphorical bayonet, and the moral high ground is a good place to bulldoze and build a refinery on.

“We live in a world in which you can talk all you want about international niceties and everything else, but we live in a world, in the real world … that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world that have existed since the beginning of time,” [Stephen] Miller told host Jake Tapper on CNN’s “The Lead” earlier this week.

Might Makes Right. How very … imperial.

No Hemispheres for Old Men

The propaganda shop at State is working overtime these days.

Crikey.

I guess this is the (east-west) hemisphere we are in. But, no, it doesn’t belong to us. We have interests — political, economic, security — in what happens in this hemisphere, arguably more urgent than we do in what happens in, say, Africa, or South Asia, etc. (though the lesson of the last century, if anyone in the Regime is listening, is that pretending things over there don’t matter is more and more dangerous in our world).

But there are a bit over a billion people in North and South America, combined, of which the US makes up about a third of a billion. That means a whole lot of people in other countries, other nations, other sovereignties. They are of the US (as the Regime repeatedly points out in trying to throw them out). Asserting that, despite having no say in how the US runs, they are “ours” is building an imperial house of cards.

Can the US, militarily, dive into any other country in the hemisphere and take out (physically or metaphorically) the heads of each government? Probably.

Does might make right? Nope. And does the US have the power, and interest, and money, and will to treat the hemisphere as conquered realms. Nope.

Or, as another person put it as a new empire was being founded …

Hey, remember when George Lucas said that in Star Wars the Empire was the US and the Rebels were the Viet Cong, and a bunch of people lost their shit over how awful that was to say about the US?

Tell me that “Our Hemisphere” image doesn’t have serious Emperor Palpatine vibes.

Oh, dear Lord, please don’t let the Star Wars prequels be an insight into modern history …

And just in case you missed it, the “Our Hemisphere” and vacuous cry about “our security” being threatened isn’t just about Venezuela (or Cuba, or Mexico, or whatever other Latin American nation the Regime is threatening today). It’s clearly encompassing an actual territorial add to the Empire in Greenland.

Text by Stephen Miller's wife of Greenland, overlaid with an American flag, and the word "SOON" — That’s a post by the wife of top Presidential Voldemort, Stephen Miller

Never mind there is already a sovereign power there. Never mind that the people there seem to have no interest. The Dear Leader wants to Change The Map of the US as part of his “legacy,” by hook or by crook (or by CIA and helicopter gunships).

Model of the proposed Trump Arch in Washington DC — The real thing will have much more gilt on it.

Maybe he’ll have a steady program of ever-updating the new Trump Arch being built outside of (appropriately enough, since one can expect a lot of US military casualties out of all this) Arlington Cemetery — a different frieze for each conquest, something like that — some friezes of the Venezuela raid here, some etchings of Greenland, maybe future attacks on Mexico and Brazil, you know, good ol’ American things like that.

Yeesh.

Impending “Doomsday”

It’s been six years since the last Avengers flick. Can Marvel bring back that magic?

I will be the first to admit that I am unreasonably in love with the MCU. As a long-time comic book collector, I just get a huge kick out of seeing Marvel characters (in one form or another) up on the big screen, and while there have been ups and downs in the franchise, even in the worst I usually find something nice to say.

That said, regarding the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday film coming out next Christmas:

I am really excited.
I am really worried.

The excitement part is just because, even if it is a dud, I expect to enjoy bits of it to make it worth my while (and an extortionate amount of money at the box office).

The worried part is is more complicated.

First, the MCU has been seriously adrift since the Avengers: Infinity War and Endgame duo. Not that I haven’t enjoyed the stuff coming out (well … I gotta admit that Secret Invasion was hard to like, for a lot of reasons).

Marvel spent a lot of time, and a lot of movies, building up an interlocking cast of characters against the menace of Thanos, and with sub-build-ups about the Avengers forming and the Infinity ~~Stones~~ Gems. One thing built on another; even where movies were a step or two askew from others, the post-credits scene would often build up that little tie-in.

By the time we got Infinity War and Endgame, everyone (in the MCU and the viewing audience) knew who everyone was, all the characters had had some solid-crossover work between them, and the villain and his glowing MacGuffin was ready for the big reveal.

Even with all of that, that duology was sort of a cast of hundreds payoff for everything that barely fit the bounds of the movies. Even with all that planning and groundwork, it verged on being just plain old too big.

What’s happened since then? A scatter-shot of movies and TV series of various popularities and viewership. Concepts left, right, and center. Very little follow-up of new (or newish) characters showing up elsewhere.

Most of all, the early work to tee up Kang the Conqueror as, a la Thanos, the BBEG for the next phase or three got blown out of the water by (a) the actor’s out-of-movie actions, and (b) not a lot of enthusiasm for the character or his hi-jinx in the couple of places (Loki 2, Ant-Man 3) we actually got to see him (or a version of him).

Marvel universe drops Jonathan Majors as Kang the Conqueror after conviction. Now what?

Jonathan Majors had two movies in the balance with Marvel, Disney before the studios dropped him Monday after his conviction for assault, harassment.

www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2023/12/19/jonathan-majors-convicted-dropped-by-marvel-disney/71971150007/

Kang getting kicked to the curb not only robbed the MCU of something to get excited about, or focus the storylines on (there was no equivalent of the Infinity Gems to play with), but it knocked a lot of planned stories out as well, requiring rewriting, replotting, rejiggering to deal with no BBEG yet identified. All the teeing To the extent that was tied to the creative and box office difficulties of the MCU for the past few years, we also got a lot of planned movies and shows canceled, poking further holes into the MCU fabric.

It took Marvel too long to decide the next big villain would instead be Doctor Doom — and, once that was announced a Comic-Con or three ago, to actually get him some action in one (1) movie, and that only mid-credits.

Bottom line, we’ve got a lot of movies and TV shows with very little tying them together and, I suspect, very few people (aside from, ahem) who have seen and/or appreciated all of them. We have a villain who’s largely a blank figure (sure, we didn’t know of Thanos’ real motivations, but at least we’d seen his actions behind the scenes before that). And we have a movie that looks like it’s going to have everyone and their sister and brother into it, both ostensibly retired heroes / characters (Thor, Captain America, Loki, and, for that matter, Robert Downey, Jr), ones waiting in the wings from other studios (we’ve finally gotten the FF, and word has it we’ll finally be getting something of the X-Men, again, using previously-used actors), and ones that we’ve gotten maybe one or two looks at in various properties but whose actual tying together into something that looks like “The Avengers” really hasn’t happened yet.

(Yes, Thunderbolts* gave us a (second) Avengers team — but, for all I really enjoyed that installment, it was made up of mostly 2nd tier characters (kind of the point) and didn’t do well in the Box Office.)

The feel I get of all of this, and the rush to get Avengers: Doomsday out, is a sense of desperation, a whiff of “We gotta do something really big that will really, truly, profoundly guaranteed to be a box office smash.” And so Feige and company are throwing every plate of spaghetti they have (including some they had said had been thrown out) at the wall to see if enough of it will stick.

I just don’t see how we’re going to get everyone introduced (to the audience and each other), working together, with an appropriate menace ready to be taken down, given the size of the cast and the lack of groundwork, over the course of a single film. But that seems to be what Marvel+Disney are shooting for.

This isn’t the first Avengers film. We’re not talking 6 heroes, some of them who’d helmed their own films, being pulled together against a known bad guy. This is kind of the opposite.

So, yeah, I’m worried. Especially since, less than a year before show time, we’re still hearing credible rumors about additional character being pulled into the mess.

New AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY Rumor Claims Fans Will See Big Screen Debut of a Fan Favorite Disney+ Series Character — GeekTyrant

Avengers: Doomsday ’s sprawling cast list has been mostly revealed, with fans excited to see the return of ...

geektyrant.com/news/new-avengers-doomsday-rumor-claims-fans-will-see-big-screen-debut-of-a-fan-favorite-disney-series-character

I really want this to be not just a movie I enjoy, but something that sort of justifies what we’ve gotten from Marvel for the past six years. Something that shows coherency of both plot and plan. Something I’m not the only one to enjoy.

Here’s hoping.

Like It Never Happened

Those who forget history can blame the people who try to erase it.

In March 2022, Congress passed a law, mandating a bronze plaque be put in the Capitol in honor of the Capitol Police who were attacked by and fought with the rioters during the January 6, 2021 Trumpist mob violence there.

Five years after the attack, four years after the law was passed, nobody (officially) knows what’s happened to the plaque — only that it’s not actually on display, and there’s been no official unveiling by Speaker Mike Johnson — who, lest we forget, was one of the challengers of the 2020 election results.

This Jan. 6 plaque was made to honor law enforcement. It’s nowhere to be found at the Capitol

Approaching the fifth anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, the official plaque honoring the police who defended democracy is nowhere to be found.

apnews.com/article/capitol-riot-jan-6-anniversary-police-plaque-f6fd39b437c339fa9ff477318a7d36e2

Such a plaque would (presumably) be seen as an indirect slap at the Dear Leader, and thus would run the risk of offending him, which GOP congresscritters seem to fear more than anything.

Legally mandated plaque, expressing thanks to Capitol Police

The plaque reads:

On behalf of a grateful Congress, this plaque honors the extraordinary individuals who bravely protected and defended this symbol of democracy on January 6, 2021. Their heroism will never be forgotten.

There are in fact folk who would very much like it to be forgotten. And are seeing to it that it is.

Back to the “Daily Grind”

(Yawn) What to do? What to do?

I’m retired (just over a year now), so in theory, every day is, in effect, an unpaid vacation day.

In practice, I usually get up just before my telecommuting wife so I can make her coffee. (That’s my job, coffee boy. The pay isn’t good, but the benefits are great.) This isn’t even as onerous as it sounds: most of the folk she works with are on the West Coast (we’re in Denver), so she rarely has any meetings before 9, often after, and gets up accordingly.

(The flip side to this is that meetings that start at 4pm for the folk out there start at 5 here, and sometimes they schedule 5pm “only time we can squeeze it in” meetings that start at 6pm here. It’s still, net-net, a nice arrangement.)

We’re just coming off the holiday season. My wife took vacation from Christmas Eve through last week. Which was great for her, but kind of threw me. Yes, I could sleep to 10 or 11, which is my Natural State (I also tend to go to sleep around 1, so it’s not that overindulgent), and I had no problem if that’s how late she wanted to sleep.

On the other hand, it really felt like, as a Standard Operating Procedure for more than a weekend, it meant I was losing half the day. And, unlike some retired folk who bang around the house, desperately searching for something to fill their time or give their existence meaning, I have a lot of stuff, mostly fun, that keeps me busy for several hours a day.

So, in some ways, it was kind of a relief when the alarm rang.

My wife’s likely to retire either this year or next (the main thing that’s held her back is keeping my son on her excellent health insurance coverage, and he ages out of that this year). How will it look when nothing aside from things we choose require us to get out of bed at any given hour? Will we set an alarm? Will we sleep the morning away, or get up and do things? What sort of hobbies and projects does she plan to occupy her time? What could we do together?

Lots of questions. It will be interesting to see how the answers turn out.

Did you know the Kennedy Center was supposed to be a profit center for the US?

Losing money is “immoral”! Reports that we are losing money any more are wrong!

It’s true! Or at least that’s what the current head of the organization, Ric Grenell, is adamant about.

‘We cannot have art institutions that lose money’: Grenell defends Kennedy Center takeover

The newly-renamed Trump-Kennedy Center is facing canceled performances and plummeting ticket sales. Amna Nawaz discussed the turmoil with Richard Grenell, the man President Trump handpicked to lead the institution.

www.pbs.org/newshour/show/we-cannot-have-art-institutions-that-lose-money-grenell-defends-kennedy-center-takeover

Grenell says that the Kennedy Center was losing money before, and That Is A Bad Thing. But now, despite plummeting ticket sales (but, Grenell assures us! lots of Big Donors donating bigly), the Trump-Kennedy Center is completely profitable, which is the important thing, because profit!

Surely that’s what was intended by Congress for the Kennedy Center. It’s right there in its Mission Statement, right?

As America’s performing arts center, and a living memorial to President John F. Kennedy, we are a leader for the arts across the United States and around the world, connecting the greatest living artists with audiences of every stripe, no matter their background. We welcome all Americans and creators and visitors from across the globe to discover, experience, learn about, be inspired by, and engage with the arts.

Oh, but there’s a Vision Statement where we will see that making money is the bestest vision there is, right?

We are the nation’s beacon for the performing arts, engaging artists and audiences around the world to share, inspire, and celebrate the cultural heritage by which a great society is defined and remembered.

Okay, then their Value statement surely shows how Value = Cash Value, right?

Excellence | Service | Inspiration | Collaboration | Curiosity | Discovery

Oh, look — three pillars, too! Surely —

The work of the Kennedy Center has been built upon three pillars:
Presenting, producing, and curating world-class art;
Offering powerful education to people of all ages, everywhere; and
Fulfilling our mandate as a living memorial to President John F. Kennedy.

(And, for at least the next three years, a living memorial to President Donald J. Trump, law suits notwithstanding.)

I don’t imagine the Center’s Social Credo is any use here …

As the Nation’s Cultural Center, the Kennedy Center’s objective is to invite art into the lives of all Americans and ensure it represents the cultural diversity of America.

Oh, no! They used the D word! Oh, the shame!

Note: I fully expect all of this to get scrubbed into something more Patriotic and Populist and White and Profit-Seeking as soon as they figure out what the new URL is going to be (as far as I can see, the main change is to add “Trump” to the web page header). That said, I’m also shocked that this little bit hasn’t been redacted with a hatchet:

Across all that we do, the Kennedy Center strives to cultivate a culture of inclusiveness, in which our art and our audiences are as rich, diverse, and ever-changing as America itself.

But America can never change! America is the Greatest! Also, they used the I word and the D word! Though they included the word “rich” so that’s allowed.

Anyway, nowhere in any of that is terminology about “fiscal responsibility” or “breaking even” or “taking care of the budget deficit caused by all those irresponsible tax cuts.”

There is a “Fast Fact” about how the Center’s budget works:

The Kennedy Center’s operating budget is composed primarily of ticket revenue and private philanthropy. As a living memorial to President John F. Kennedy, the Kennedy Center receives an annual federal appropriation for capital repairs and maintenance of its facilities.

So all the blurring of budget lines between “Ew, nobody likes that music!” and “Look how bad the maintenance is!” makes no sense; the former is about ticket sales (if they were actually insufficient) and donors (which Grenell seems to think are now flocking to the Center), and the latter about Congress allocating sufficient funds to keep the place up. That breakout is clear when you look at the FY26 budget request, which only deals with O&M costs.

The Trump-Kennedy Center Backfired. Ric Grenell Is Gaslighting Everyone

Artists are canceling shows after Trump’s name went on the Kennedy Center. Ric Grenell denies the link and threatens critics to silence dissent.

www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-kennedy-center-backfired-ric-141628322.html

Grennell spent his time in the PBS News Hour interview basically saying:

The multiple stories that ticket sales are down are not true. Or at least the specifics are not true; he didn’t specify.
There are Lots of Big Donors Donating Bigly.
PBS is biased and losing money itself, nyah!
Making money is the important thing here. Losing money is “immoral.”

Inspiring words, indeed. Clearly the US is on its way to being a leader in the creative arts, just as it is becoming a leader in civil liberties and making the world a safer, freer place.

The Mafioso Foreign Policy

“Nice country you got there. Shame if you forced us to kidnap your head of state.”

So, from what I can tell, the Trump Regime has now put all the nations in the entire Western Hemisphere on notice that, if they don’t play ball nicely with the US (bending their economic, domestic, and foreign policies to what profits US companies and curries the President’s favor), the US reserves the right to exercise a “law enforcement action” and take out their top leadership (we’ll figure out some charges beforehand, though).

And if their successors don’t play ball and move in the “certain direction” we want, regardless of whether they’re dictators or democratically elected or personally selected by the US, we’ll take them out, too.

Trump Threatens Venezuela’s New Leader With a Fate Worse Than Maduro’s

The president told The Atlantic that Delcy Rodríguez needs to comply with U.S. wishes—or else.

www.theatlantic.com/national-security/2026/01/trump-venezuela-maduro-delcy-rodriguez/685497/

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio: Marco Rubio: US wants Venezuela to ‘move in certain direction’

In the NBC interview, Marco Rubio was repeatedly asked about Donald Trump’s claim that the US was aiming to “run” Venezuela, he avoided answering directly who was currently running the country.

news.sky.com/video/us-secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-marco-rubio-us-wants-venezuela-to-move-in-certain-direction-13490345

Oh, and, Marco? A “law enforcement operation” doesn’t usually involve leaving boots on the ground, and threatening the folks not arrested with something “still worse” if they don’t truckle to the police department’s demands, and, oh, also open up their natural resources to the police department’s preferred vendors, and, also when it results in civilian casualties people get suspended and investigations take place.

Oh, I see, this line’s not about being truthful, that’s about coming up with an excuse for not seeking Congressional approval. All we’re doing is a “law enforcement operation,” not a war. Sure, Congress is supposed to be informed (if not approve) an actual war, but, well, even if carriers and jets and military personnel were all involved, it was only about arresting a Bad Guy (and his wife).

Of course, the Regime can pivot at an instant. If a plot of land we want to own / exploit / control doesn’t have a flourishing drug trade … no problem! We just invoke National Security as the catch-all phrase for The President can do what he wants, whenever he wants.

So now the heads of Cuba and Columbia and Mexico are also on notice that the choppers might be coming for them next.

Marco Rubio says he believes Cuba is ‘in a lot of trouble’

The secretary of state’s latest remarks came after he told reporters that he’d be “concerned” if he were a government official in Havana.

www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/marco-rubio-believes-cuba-trouble-havana-maduro-military-venezuela-rcna252150

Yeah. Invading Cuba has always ended well for the US.

People who were laughing about Trump trying to take over Greenland are not laughing now, since Trump has continued to bring up the subject …

In an interview with The Atlantic magazine published Sunday, Mr. Trump reiterated his wish to take over Greenland.
“We do need Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defense,” he told the magazine.

… as has Rubio, and, naturally, even Steven Miller (or his wife) have dropped “hints” that the US is quite interested in taking over the place.

For “national security,” of course. For “defense.” Which he can always use as an excuse to act unilaterally, without any of what passes for Congressional oversight these days.

Danish PM tells Trump to stop ‘threats’ against Greenland

Mette Frederiksen said the “US has no right to annex any of the three nations in the Danish kingdom”.

www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g0zg974v1o

Also, lots of profitable minerals for Big Campaign Donors to extract. 🙄 The remarkable thing is that Trump isn’t even reticent about listing that as an opinion.

Diploma-tic Dispatches

“Now I am the Master.”

The son-unit received his formal MA diploma from the University of Iceland yesterday, wrapping up his graduate work in Viking & Medieval Norse Studies. It’s kind of weird to think we won’t have a good excuse to visit Reykjavik (except maybe transferring through on Iceland Air) any more, but we’re both really proud of the work he put in on this, the knowledge he gained (and shared), and this journey he’s been on.

For the record, I am now (besides the cat) the least-educated (by degree) person in the house. I’m not sure how I feel about that.

Of course, the question (which we try not to bring up too much, not wanting to be those parents) is, what now. He is applying for museum work, some possible archaeological positions, and whatever else he can find in the field, focusing on local things here in Colorado but also a bit elsewhere in the States. Meanwhile, he has some part-time work (and is looking to improve that), and, regardless, he has a roof here over his head for as long as he needs it.